Legal Opinion

Widness v. Central States Fire Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1951PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The verdict herein was approved by the trial court and must be sustained if there is credible evidence to support'it. Wallin v. Sutherland (1948), 252 Wis. 149, 152, 31 N. W. (2d) 178; Sonnenberg v. Hardware Mut. Casualty Co. (1949), 255 Wis. 261, 264, 38 N. W. (2d) 491.

The question of the value of the hay is not contested by the defendant on appeal. It is their contention that the barn would not hold the quantity of hay plaintiff claims was there. They rely principally on three exhibits, photographs showing the Jones barn and silo in question before the fire. It is agreed that the barn loft…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Koepp v. National Enameling & Stamping Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Wolf v. RamlowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Jansen v. HerkertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Wallin v. SutherlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Sonnenberg v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wasilewski v. Board of School Directors of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Lisowski v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Holtz v. FogartyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Filipiak v. PlombonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Plainse v. EngleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API