Filipiak v. Plombon

While additional issues are raised by defendant, we limit this opinion to passing upon these three questions :(1) Does the evidence support the finding that the defendant was negligent with respect to maintenance of the private walk?(2) Does the evidence support the finding that Mrs. Filipiak was negligent as to the care she exercised for her own safety?(3) Was it prejudicial error for the trial court, in conducting the voir dire examination of the jury, to have asked questions which indicated to the jury that defendant was insured against the liability sought to be enforced by plaintiffs?

Negl…