Legal Opinion

Jansen v. Herkert

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1946PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

Defendants contend: (1) That as a matter of law plaintiff assumed the risk of injury; (2) that she was guilty of contributory negligence in going to sleep in the automobile ; (3 ) that the issues as to defendant’s negligence should have been submitted to the jury; (4) that certain evidence was erroneously excluded; (5) that the damages are excessive. These contentions require a consideration of the facts.

Plaintiff was twenty-five years of age and lived in the village of Little Chute. Pursuant to an understanding she came to the Conway Hotel in Appleton on November 8, 1944, at about 7 o’clock…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Forbes v. ForbesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Hoffman v. LabutzkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Delfosse v. New Franken Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Schmidt v. LeuthenerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Zoellner v. KaiserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Widness v. Central States Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Cooke v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Siblik v. Motor Transport Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Schuld v. SterbenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Cooke v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API