Jansen v. Herkert
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.
Defendants contend: (1) That as a matter of law plaintiff assumed the risk of injury; (2) that she was guilty of contributory negligence in going to sleep in the automobile ; (3 ) that the issues as to defendant’s negligence should have been submitted to the jury; (4) that certain evidence was erroneously excluded; (5) that the damages are excessive. These contentions require a consideration of the facts.
Plaintiff was twenty-five years of age and lived in the village of Little Chute. Pursuant to an understanding she came to the Conway Hotel in Appleton on November 8, 1944, at about 7 o’clock…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Forbes v. ForbesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Hoffman v. LabutzkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Delfosse v. New Franken Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Schmidt v. LeuthenerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Zoellner v. KaiserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Widness v. Central States Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- Cooke v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Siblik v. Motor Transport Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Schuld v. SterbenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Cooke v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1961