Legal Opinion
Wagner Electric Corp. v. Thomas
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided June 20, 1985No. Civ. A. 85-2212-OPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
EARL E. O’CONNOR, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs in this action have filed a motion to stay the enforcement of an order issued by defendant Morris Kay in his capacity as Regional Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). A hearing on the motion was held on April 9, 1985, and both sides have presented numerous written briefs. We are now prepared to rule.
I. Statutory Framework.
The challenged EPA order was issued pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601 et seq. Perhaps the best known…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Matter of Kimber Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Wagner Seed Co. v. DaggettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- B.R. MacKay & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1986
- United States v. Rohm and Haas Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
- South MacOmb Disposal Authority v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.