Matter of Kimber Petroleum Corp.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
110 N.J. 69 (1988)
539 A.2d 1181
IN THE MATTER OF THE DIRECTIVE OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, ISSUED TO KIMBER PETROLEUM CORPORATION, SHELL OIL COMPANY AND SOLAR OIL COMPANY.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued November 18, 1986.
Decided April 18, 1988.
Edwin R. Matthews and Edward J. Farrell argued the cause for appellants, Kimber Petroleum and Solar Oil Company (Budd, Larner, Gross, Picillo, Rosenbaum, Greenberg & Sade, attorneys for Kimber Petroleum Corporation, and Farrell, Curtis, Carlin & Davidson, attorneys for Solar Oil Company; Edwin R. Matthews, Edward J.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Holmdel Builders Ass'n v. Township of HolmdelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. Ppg Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- ABBOTT BY ABBOTT v. BurkeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.