Legal Opinion
United States v. Rohm and Haas Co., Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 19, 1987No. Civ. A. 85-4386PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GERRY, District Judge:
Factual Background
Plaintiff, the United States of America, on behalf of the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has brought this action pursuant to Section 107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a), to recover costs it incurred for enforcement, investigation and clean-up activities at the Lipari Landfill in the Township of Mantua in Gloucester County, New Jersey. Plaintiff also seeks a declaratory judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201, fixing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. R.W. Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- United States v. KramerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- Amland Properties Corp. v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- United States v. Rohm & Haas Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.