Legal Opinion

Castaldo v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided November 1, 2000No. 10-99-147-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILL VANCE, Justice.

During the course of Michael Castaldo’s trial on possession of marihuana charges, the trial court allowed the State to present testimony (1) detailing the actions of the dangerously intoxicated driver of the vehicle in which Castaldo was a passenger and (2) showing that Castaldo may have been intoxicated by the use of marihuana and alcohol. Because the evidence of the actions of the driver has character-proving tendencies, we conclude that the trial court erred by overruling Castaldo’s objection under Rule of Evidence 404(b) and, finding that he was harmed by the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Santellan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Abdnor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Leday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  2. Castaldo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Burks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  4. Cochran v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  5. Castaldo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API