Castaldo v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
The opinion was delivered
2Per curiam
In this case we address whether Rule 404(b) prohibits the admission of extraneous bad acts committed by a third party and whether same transaction contextual evidence ever requires a limiting instruction. We will reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
1. Background
Sheriffs Deputy Scott Dyson was alerted to watch for a possible intoxicated driver headed south on Interstate Highway 45. Before the vehicle reached his location, a dispatcher informed Dyson that the automobile had turned around and was headed north in the southbound lane of 1^45. Dyson…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Wesbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Mann v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Castaldo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
4Cited by70 opinions
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Ruiz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
- Walker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006
- Thomas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
- Peters v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.