Legal Opinion

Castaldo v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 26, 2002No. 0189-01PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

The opinion was delivered

2Per curiam

In this case we address whether Rule 404(b) prohibits the admission of extraneous bad acts committed by a third party and whether same transaction contextual evidence ever requires a limiting instruction. We will reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

1. Background

Sheriffs Deputy Scott Dyson was alerted to watch for a possible intoxicated driver headed south on Interstate Highway 45. Before the vehicle reached his location, a dispatcher informed Dyson that the automobile had turned around and was headed north in the southbound lane of 1^45. Dyson…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wesbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Mann v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Castaldo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000

4Cited by70 opinions

  1. King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Ruiz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
  3. Walker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006
  4. Thomas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
  5. Peters v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API