Cochran v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice WILLIAM J. CORNELIUS (Retired).
In a jury trial, Samuel Heath Cochran was convicted of attempted manufacture of methamphetamine. Cochran elected to have the trial court set his punishment. His punishment, enhanced by a prior felony conviction, was set by the trial court at twenty years’ confinement.
On appeal, Cochran contends that the State did not give him proper or adequate notice of the prior felony conviction it intended to use as enhancement; there is legally and factually insufficient evidence to support the judgment of conviction; the trial court erroneously…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Resendez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
- May v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
- Richardson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
- Frank Richardson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
- Isaac Jones, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.