Legal Opinion
Knass v. Blue Cross of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 11, 1991No. D011798PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FROEHLICH, J.
Henry Knass (Knass) appeals from a judgment affirming an arbitrator’s award in favor of Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross). Since Knass did not challenge the award within the 100-day period provided by Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 1288, he may not now challenge it on appeal. We therefore affirm the judgment.
Factual and Procedural Background
Knass injured his leg on December 23, 1983. On the date of the injury he was insured by Blue Cross under an individual policy, effective October 15, 1983.
Three surgeries on three separate dates were required because of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Schroud v. Van C. Argiris & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Woodard v. Southern California Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- DeMello v. SouzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Banks v. Milwaukee Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. MacRiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Maynard v. BrandonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Marsch v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Sousaris v. MillerHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- Louise Gardens of Encino Homeowners' Ass'n v. Truck Insurance Exchange Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.