Legal Opinion
James Haynes Camarillo v. Daniel J. McCarthy Director
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 1, 1993No. 92-15991PublishedCited by 134 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The memorandum disposition filed April 2, 1993, is redesignated as an authored opinion by Judge Farris.
OPINION
FARRIS, Circuit Judge:
Defendants, California state prison officials, appeal the denial of their motion for summary judgment in an action brought by former state prisoner James Haynes Camar-illo pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. While incarcerated, Camarillo, who is HIV-positive, was transferred to a housing unit for HIV-positive inmates. Camarillo’s suit alleged that his transfer violated his constitutional rights of: (1) equal protection; (2) privacy; (3) due process; (4) freedom…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- Ross W. Sorrels v. Ronald McKee David Buss Cly Evans Archie Grant Loreli, Cruthers Kay Walter Jim Blodgett Joseph LehmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Charles M. Grossman, M.D. v. City of Portland, a Public Body, and Todd DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Brinkley v. Harbour Recreation ClubCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- LSO, Ltd. v. StrohCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- John Doe v. Joan DelieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.