Legal Opinion
LSO, Ltd. v. Stroh
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 6, 2000No. Nos. 98-56093, 98-56349 and 98-56465PublishedCited by 228 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge:
OVERVIEW
This litigation arises from the efforts of Appellant Lifestyles Organization, Limited (“LSO”) to hold its annual Erotic Art Exhibition and Trade Show in Palm Springs, California, in 1997. According to LSO’s complaint, defendants Jay Stroh, Manuel R. Espinoza and. David E. Gill, all officials of the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (“ABC”), (collectively the “Officials”) attempted to prevent LSO from holding the exhibition. They allegedly did this by threatening the Palm Springs Convention Center (the “Center”) and other businesses with…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by228 opinions
- Porter v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Angela Bernhardt v. County of Los Angeles Lloyd W. Pellman, Individually Lloyd W. Pellman, in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Wolfson v. BrammerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Shanks v. DresselCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Shafer v. County of Santa BarbaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
223 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.