Estate of Hanley v. Andresen
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtScholfield, J.
— The estate of Raymond J. Hanley, Sr., appeals a declaratory judgment awarding the proceeds of a federal employee insurance policy to Hanley's former wife, respondent Andresen, the designated beneficiary under the policy. The estate contends it was entitled to the proceeds because the couple's divorce decree had awarded all interest in the policy to Hanley. We find no error and affirm.
Hanley was an employee of the United States Postal Service from 1968 to 1978. One of the benefits of his employment was a federal employees group insurance policy issued pursuant to the Federal Employees Group…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ridgway v. RidgwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Beverly Huff v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Elizabeth HuffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Edward Manning, and Thomas Gaines, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- AETNA LIFE INSURANCE v. WadsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- United Benefit Life Insurance v. PriceWashington Supreme Court · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. PotterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. ThompsonDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1997
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. BrowningDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1993
- Van Den Broek v. TangFairfax County Circuit Court · 2014
- Peggy Spradling McCord v. Nina M. SpradlingMississippi Supreme Court · 1997