Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Potter

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 16, 1988No. 87-449, 87-477 and 87-478PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The question presented on these appeals is whether the doctrine of federal preemption applies, specifically, whether federal law allowed a former husband to change the beneficiary on a Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance (FEGLI) policy, even though a state circuit court, in a divorce proceeding, had ordered him to maintain his former wife as the sole beneficiary.

The learned trial judge, in a lengthy judgment, determined that "the effect of a provision in a decree of divorce requiring a party to maintain a designated person as a beneficiary of life insurance create[d] a vested equitable…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BilleckSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. McCord v. SpradlingMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. BrowningDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Ex Parte BilleckSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Maretta v. HillmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API