Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Potter
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The question presented on these appeals is whether the doctrine of federal preemption applies, specifically, whether federal law allowed a former husband to change the beneficiary on a Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance (FEGLI) policy, even though a state circuit court, in a divorce proceeding, had ordered him to maintain his former wife as the sole beneficiary.
The learned trial judge, in a lengthy judgment, determined that "the effect of a provision in a decree of divorce requiring a party to maintain a designated person as a beneficiary of life insurance create[d] a vested equitable…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ex Parte BilleckSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- McCord v. SpradlingMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. BrowningDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1993
- Ex Parte BilleckSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Maretta v. HillmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.