United Benefit Life Insurance v. Price
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
Quaere:
Is the named beneficiary in a life insurance policy or the administrator of the insured’s estate entitled to the proceeds of the policy which have been paid into court by the insurance company in an interpleader action where: (a) the insured had the right to change beneficiaries; (b) the named beneficiary was the wife of the insured at the time the policy was issued but had subsequently been divorced from him; (c) the divorce decree confirmed and approved the property settlement agreement which had been set out in full in the findings of fact, and then, pursuant thereto and adopting…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Grimm v. GrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Occidental Life Insurance v. PowersWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Sullivan v. Union Oil Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Thorp v. RandazzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- In Re Garrity's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1945
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- AETNA LIFE INSURANCE v. WadsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Baekgaard v. CarreiroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Sorensen v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- Heifner v. SoderstromDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1955
- Northwestern Life Insurance v. PerrigoWashington Supreme Court · 1955
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.