Legal Opinion

Van Den Broek v. Tang

Fairfax County Circuit Court

Decided March 5, 2014No. Case No. CL-2013-0012884PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge Randy I. Bellows

Before the Court is the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. On February 21, 2014, the parties presented their arguments, and the Court took the matter under advisement. After considering the oral arguments and briefs of both parties and for the reasons discussed below, the Court grants the Plaintiff’s motion and finds that federal law preempts the Defendant’s counterclaims.

Introduction

The purpose of this letter opinion is to address an issue that has not been explicitly resolved by controlling precedent. That issue is whether federal law preempts a breach of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Wissner v. WissnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Kennedy v. Plan Administrator for DuPont Savings & Investment PlanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Ridgway v. RidgwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Evans v. DiamondDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API