Meyers v. Caruthers
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Redmond 6. Cole, Judge. Action by B. E. Caruthers against John H. Meyers for damages for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
B. E. Caruthers, as plaintiff, commenced an action against John H. Meyers, as defendant, ro recover the sum of $25,000 as damages for personal injuries, and it was tried to a jury, which resulted in a verdict and judgment in the sum of $18,500, to reverse which this proceeding in error has been regularly commenced.
Por convenience, the parties will be hereafter referred to as plaintiff and defendant, respectively, as they appeared in the trial court.
The record discloses that the plaintiff waB a switchman for the Prisco Railroad, while the defendant was the owner and operator of the Tulsa…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. HartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. RushingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Bean v. RumrillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Bunker v. HardingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. PruittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Morain v. LollisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Carignano v. BoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Guest v. ShamburgerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Edwards v. Central Life Assur. SocietySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Fleming v. HodgsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.