Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Welltech, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided March 5, 1991No. 72305PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ADAMS, Presiding Judge:
Welltech seeks reversal and a new trial, or, in the alternative, remittitur of an $82,-841.00 judgment entered after a jury found in favor of Rogers on his retaliatory discharge claim under 85 O.S.1981 § 5. Among other allegations of error, Welltech asserts the refusal of certain jury instructions and the giving of others requires reversal. Welltech also claims Rogers failed to sustain his burden of proof at trial, and that the trial court should have directed a verdict in favor of Welltech.
In his counter-appeal, Rogers alleges the trial court erred in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Buckner v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Woodall v. Chandler Material Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Hess v. Excise Board of McCurtain CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Webb v. DAYTON TIRE & RUBBER CO. ETC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Kirby Bruce Marshall v. Trw, Inc., Reda Pump DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brown v. MFC Finance Co. of OklahomaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
- Estrada v. Port City Properties, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
- Mike v. PROFESSIONAL CLINICAL LABORATORY, INC.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2011
- CARNAHAN v. CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- Eva Alberty v. Tyson Foods, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.