Legal Opinion
Mike v. PROFESSIONAL CLINICAL LABORATORY, INC.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided February 16, 2011No. Case 09-CV-363 JHP FHMPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES H. PAYNE, District Judge.
This is a diversity action wherein Kelli Mike (“Plaintiff’) claims injury as a result of a workplace drug test conducted by her former employer, Leisure Village Health Care Center (“Leisure Village”). Plaintiffs test result came back positive for illicit drugs. Defendant Professional Clinical Laboratory, Inc. (“ProLab”) was the laboratory with whom Leisure Village previously contracted to perform medical testing for its long-term care residents. Plaintiff alleges ProLab was a party to the workplace drug test and violated the Oklahoma Standards…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kendall v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Thompson v. Presbyterian Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mike v. Professional Clinical Laboratory, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- RJY Properties, LLC; RJY Construction, LLC; Robbi Jill Young v. Energy One Federal Credit Union; Pearl District Federal Credit Union; Unknown Members of the Board of Directors of Energy One Federal Credit Union; Unknown Members of the Board of Directors of Pearl District Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2026