Legal Opinion
Hess v. Excise Board of McCurtain County
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 16, 1985No. 61278PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
The issue presented is whether the county excise board [Board] is required by the introductory paragraph of 19 O.S.Supp. 1982 § 180.63 1 to grant class “A” officers the maximum salary increase allowable by the valuation-based portion of the formula in part A of that section. We answer in the negative and hold that, in the absence of a showing of arbitrary conduct on the part of the Board, a court may not interfere with the Board’s exercise of discretion in deciding what portion of the salary increase to be computed by the valuation-based formula in § 180.63(A) should be…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Independent School District No. 89 of Oklahoma County v. Oklahoma City Federation of Teachers, Local 2309Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Sneed v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. MossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Shea v. SheaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Cartwright v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- TXO Production Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.