Hammel v. Neylan
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Plaintiff filed his petition in the superior court of Los Angeles County praying for a writ of mandate against the State Board of Control and members thereof, commanding it and them to allow and approve certain claims, the aggregate amount of which was the sum of $2,199.26, presented hy him as sheriff of said county against the state for services rendered by him as such sheriff in the month of December, 1914, -and expenses necessarily incurred in convey-' ing persons, adjudged by the superior court of said county to be committed, to state prisons and other state institutions.
Defendants…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Inglin v. HoppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Sullivan v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- State ex. rel. Dakota Trust Co. v. StutsmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Hensley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Lawrence v. BoothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bank of Italy v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Tulare Water Co. v. State Water CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Conroy v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Jackson v. WildeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.