Legal Opinion
Ranco Industrial Products Corp. v. Dunlap
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 13, 1985No. Nos. 84-3720, 84-3729PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WEIS, Circuit Judge:
Edward B. Dunlap appeals from a district court order finding him in civil contempt of a consent decree and awarding Randustrial Corporation $1,500 in compensatory damages as well as $5,000 for attorneys’ fees incurred in prosecuting the contempt. Randustrial Corp. v. Dunlap, 595 F.Supp. 873 (W.D.Pa.1984). Dunlap contends that the district court erred in holding him in contempt and that even if that ruling was correct the court erred in calculating damages. In any event, he asserts that attorneys’ fees should not have been awarded for a contempt of court…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ursic v. Bethlehem MinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Richard J. Mayberry v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Hecht v. Don Mowry Flexo Parts, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Eisele v. Holloway (In re Eisele)District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Robin Woods, Inc. v. WoodsDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Sussman v. Salem, Saxon & Nielsen, P.A.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.