Legal Opinion
Robin Woods, Inc. v. Woods
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 18, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-2186PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LEE, District Judge.
The principal issues addressed herein are whether defendants have violated this Court’s preliminary injunction of February 7, 1992, and are therefore in contempt of Court, and if so, the appropriate sanctions for such contempt.
BACKGROUND
1. The facts relevant to the Order of February 7, 1992, entering the preliminary injunction, are set forth in the 48 Findings of Fact contained in the Memorandum Opinion accompanying the Order, 1 and will not be repeated here except as is necessary to an understanding of the issues now before the Court.
2. Upon…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Eisenberg v. GagnonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Scott Paper Company, a Corporation v. Scott's Liquid Gold, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Campbell Soup Company v. Conagra, Inc. Sallie W. Rosenthal Conagra, Inc. And Sallie RosenthalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Vuitton Et Fils S. A. v. Carousel Handbags, and Solomon Mizrahi, Joseph Mizrahi, and Maurice Mizrahi, Additional DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Robin Woods Inc. v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Loftus v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Robin Woods Inc. v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Cottman Transmission Systems, Inc. v. MelodyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Cottman Transmission Systems, Inc. v. MelodyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994