Legal Opinion

Wright v. Towle

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Jennison, J.) Keplevin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

Wright Brothers, on or about the fourth day of April, 1885, gave a mortgage to the plaintiff on a stock of goods, to secure the payment of a note of $700 for money obtained about a year before, the note being payable on demand.

The firm of Wright Brothers was composed of Cyrus Wright, who was husband of the plaintiff, and his brother, Charles O. Wright; and the firm, in the month of March, 1886, were unable to pay the note and mortgage. The plaintiff demanded payment, but failed to obtain the same, and thereupon commenced a foreclosure of her mortgage by taking possession of the mortgaged…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dawson v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1852
  2. Sneed v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Leppig v. BretzelMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. McDonald v. CaseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sterling v. CallahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Whelpley v. StoughtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Kamm v. ReesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
  4. Doolittle v. GavaganMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API