Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Casey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Jackson. (Peck, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This is an action of trespass on the case brought in the Jackson circuit court by the plaintiff to recover damages occasioned by the sale of liquor to her husband by the defendant between the 1st day of October, 1887, and the 10th day of January, 1888. She ■recovered judgment for $350.

The declaration charges that the sales were illegal, in that her husband, John McDonald, was a person in the habit of getting intoxicated at the time the liquors were sold to him, which fact was well known to defendant, and that, on account of such sales, the said' John. McDonald became intoxicated, and Avhile…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. HinchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morton v. RothMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Wright v. TowleMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Larrow v. MillerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API