Leppig v. Bretzel
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Kent. Creditor’s bill. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Marston, J".
There is an entire absence of any showing of fraud in this case. It clearly appears that the defendant Amelia Bretzel had means of her own, as early as 1860, which she loaned to Mr. Desenberg or the firm of which he-was a member, and that from time to time out of her own earnings she added to the same — so that in 1863 or 1861 it amounted to about six hundred dollars. Her husband then *322purchased certain real estate, this money was used in part to pay for it, and the title thereto taken in his name.
This property was afterwards sold and the money put into the grocery business, which…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Roberts v. BrothersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Wright v. TowleMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Winslow v. PutnamMichigan Supreme Court · 1902