Legal Opinion

Whelpley v. Stoughton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Van Buren; Buck, J. Assumpsit by Henry Whelpley against Clarissa S. Stoughton on a promissory note. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The principal legal question in this case is whether a married- woman’s note is supported by a sufficient consideration to make it binding upon her separate property where it is given for the surrender of, and to prevent the payee from attempting to collect, a note of the same amount against the husband, by attacking the validity of the transfer by said husband to the wife of all his property, including a farm worth about $8,000, upon the claim that such transfer was voluntary and in fraud of his creditors. Many decisions of this court support the proposition that the executory contract of a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wright v. TowleMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. DouglasMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Koengeter v. HolzbaughMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Whelpley v. StoughtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Dowagiac National Bank v. MaierMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Hamilton v. ParentMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API