Legal Opinion

Sterling v. Callahan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1893PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff sued to recover damages caused by a sale of liquors to his minor son, and produced, as witnesses to prove the sales and intoxication of the son, Robert Millard and Fred White and the son himself. The testimony need not be set out at length. Suffice it to say that each of the three witnesses gave evidence tending to support the allegations contained in the declaration.

The circuit judge charged the jury, in part, as follows:

“ Now, gentlemen, without referring to any part of the evidence, I leave the matter wholly to you. It is for you to say under all circumstances, has this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Theisen v. JohnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Wright v. TowleMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Stockdale's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Scahill v. Ætna Indemnity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Hink v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Fors v. ForsMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. People v. SnyderMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API