Legal Opinion

Fred Meyer Stores v. Godfrey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 19, 2008No. 0304253; A134247PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*498EDMONDS, P. J.

In this workers’ compensation case, employer seeks judicial review of the Workers’ Compensation Board’s order on remand, which held that, because employer had failed to raise an issue on initial board review or judicial review, that issue was not properly before the board on remand. In this judicial review, employer asserts that “[t]he Board abused its discretion by failing to apply its own preservation rule when the Order on Remand imposed an obligation on employer to preserve its argument not only before the hearings division, but also before the Board on initial review” and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. Chase Gardens, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. J. Arlie Bryant, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Brewer v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Godfrey v. Fred Meyer StoresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Booth v. Tektronix, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frazer v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Fred Meyer Stores v. GodfreyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. SchwanenbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Marsh v. Saif Corp. (In re Comp. of Marsh)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API