Legal Opinion

Manchester Solar, LLC v. Yamhill County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 11, 2023No. A181678PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

554 Argued and submitted August 15, affirmed October 11, 2023 MANCHESTER SOLAR, LLC, Petitioner, v. YAMHILL COUNTY, Respondent. Land Use Board of Appeals 2023016; A181678

538 P3d 223

Petitioner seeks judicial review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) order that affirmed the county’s determination that petitioner did not have a vested right to complete its solar project under OAR 660-003-0140 as implemented in Yamhill County Zoning Ordinance 402.08(A). LUBA concluded that, when sub- sections (1) and (2) of the rule are read together, petitioner was required to obtain an extension of its…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Force v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Mountain West Investment Corp. v. City of SilvertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Forster v. Polk CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Neice v. Prosper PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  2. Manchester Solar, LLC v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. Neice v. Prosper PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API