Legal Opinion

People v. Matlock

California Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1959No. Crim. 6227PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

A jury found defendant guilty of murder of the first degree and robbery of the second degree and fixed the penalty on the murder count at death. This is an appeal (pursuant to Pen. Code, § 1239, subd. (b)) from the ensuing judgment and from an order denying defendant’s motion for new trial. The theory of the defense was that defendant did not murder his victim, Mas Shayne, in the perpetration of robbery but, rather, acted solely at the request of Shayne who, because he desired to die but did not wish to give the appearance of suicide, induced defendant to strangle him and to take his property…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. SchaderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. DitsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. People v. LindenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API