Legal Opinion

Bencharsky v. Cottman Transmission Systems, LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 29, 2008No. C 08-03402 SIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION and GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

On November 7, 2008, the Court heard argument on motions by defendant Cottman Transmission Systems, LLC (“Cottman”) to compel arbitration and to dismiss, and a motion by defendant American Driveline System, Inc. (“ADS”) to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, the Court GRANTS Cottman’s motions to compel arbitration and to dismiss. The Court also GRANTS ADS’s motion to dismiss.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Kund, LLC…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. R & L Ltd. Investments, Inc. v. Cabot Investment Properties, LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2010
  2. Bigge Crane and Rigging Co. v. Agility Project Logistics, IncDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  3. Build Group, Inc. v. Indian Harbor Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
  4. Jameson v. Ringside Development CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
  5. Siert v. Spiffy Franchising, LLC.District Court, N.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API