Legal Opinion

Julian Toney v. Wcco Television, Midwest Cable and Satellite, Inc., Also Known as Wcco Tv, Channel 4, Also Known as Iowcco Tv, Channel 411

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 7, 1996No. 95-1190PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, Associate Justice (Ret.).

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff-Appellant Julian Toney (“Toney”) brought this action against Defendant-Appellee WCCO Television, Midwest Cable and Satellite, Inc., a/k/a WCCO TV, Channel 4 (“WCCO”), alleging that a report on the sale of dogs to research institutions defamed him and defamed him by implication. The district court granted summary judgment to WCCO. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse in part and affirm in part the district court’s judgment that WCCO did not defame Toney, reverse its dismissal of Toney’s defamation by implication claim, and remand…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Bertell Ollman v. Rowland Evans, Robert NovakCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  5. Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Huckabee v. Time Warner Entertainment Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Ken Hammer v. The City of Osage Beach, Missouri, and Jim SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  3. Mohr v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Jill Harmon and John Kean v. City of Kansas City, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. Mohr v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 2005

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API