Legal Opinion

Bertell Ollman v. Rowland Evans, Robert Novak

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 6, 1984No. 79-2265PublishedCited by 387 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STARR, Circuit Judge:

This defamation action arises out of the publication of a syndicated column by Rowland Evans and Robert Novak in May 1978. The question before us is whether the allegedly defamatory statements set forth in the column are constitutionally protected expressions of opinion or, as appellant contends, actionable assertions of fact. We conclude, as did the District Court, that the challenged statements are entitled to absolute First Amendment protection as expressions of opinion.

I

Rowland Evans and Robert Novak are nationally syndicated columnists whose columns appear regularly…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by387 opinions

  1. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Carr v. BrasherTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. ConnaughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Thompson v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Bentley v. BuntonTexas Supreme Court · 2002

382 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API