Legal Opinion

Mohr v. Grant

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2005No. 74208-1PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*815¶1 Respondents, Eliot B. Mohr and Mohr & Company, Inc., d/b/a Kitchen Interior Showcase (hereinafter Mohr or KIS), filed a defamation suit alleging that a series of newscasts aired by petitioners, KXLY-TV and reporter Tom Grant (hereinafter KXLY and Grant), were defamatory because they contained false statements and omitted material facts. The trial court granted KXLY and Grant’s motion for summary judgment, holding that Mohr failed to establish falsity with convincing clarity because the newscasts did not contain false statements and the newscasts were substantially true. The Court of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. In Re Welfare of SegoWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Bender v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. RappSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. Mohr v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Life Designs Ranch, Inc. v. Michael SommerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Woody v. StappCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. Corey v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API