Legal Opinion

Pollock v. Morelli

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 1976No. 206PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Judge:

This appeal arises from the adjudication of the chancellor that the implied covenant of quiet enjoyment in the appellants’ lease was not breached by their lessor, Thomas Morelli, and the consequent failure of the chancellor to find damages in the form of relocation expenses and lost profits of appellants’ business.

In January and early February 1971, appellant Eugene Pollock purchased a dry cleaning business situated in Great Valley Shopping Center. In the process of acquiring the business, Mr. Pollock entered into a seven and one half year lease, with appellee as lessor, for the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Reste Realty Corporation v. CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  2. Exton Drive-In, Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. James v. HaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Owsley v. HamnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Kelly v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Advent Systems Limited, in No. 90-1069 v. Unisys Corporation, in No. 90-1070Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  3. 2401 Pennsylvania Avenue Corp. v. Federation of Jewish AgenciesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Echo Consulting Services, Inc. v. North Conway BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  5. Jonnet Development Corp. v. Dietrich Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API