People v. Williams
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a new trial. H. Z. Austin, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
BARDIN, J., pro tem.
The defendant was informed against for the crime of grand larceny. Upon his trial he was convicted of petit larceny and, having suffered a previous conviction of felony, which he confessed on arraignment, was sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison at San Quentin. He now appeals from the judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for a new trial, and also from an order denying his motion in arrest of judgment.
[1] It will be unnecessary to comment further upon the attempted appeal from the order denying defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment than to say…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. MatuszewskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. Ho Kim YouCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- People v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- People v. MullenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Beglinger v. ShieldWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- People v. CamposCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- People v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- People v. VollmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. OrmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.