Legal Opinion

People v. Mullen

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 6, 1908No. Crim. No. 70PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial and from an order denying a motion in arrest of judgment. B. N. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Defendant was charged by information with the crime of manslaughter alleged to have been committed upon one Patrick Connelly. Upon his plea of not guilty a trial was had, wherein a verdict of guilty of involuntary manslaughter was returned, upon which he was adjudged to serve a term of five years in state prison. He prosecutes this appeal from the judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial, and also from an order of the court denying his motion in arrest of judgment.

There is no law authorizing an appeal in arrest of judgment, and, therefore, the attempted appeal from this order…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. MunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. People v. RolfeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. People v. MatuszewskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. People v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. People v. DenommeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. BenavidesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. CayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. People v. CrosbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API