Legal Opinion

People v. Flores

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 13, 1936No. Crim. 2869PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROTH, J., pro tem.

Appellants were charged by an amended information, containing thirteen counts. Count I charged a violation of section 209 of the Penal Code, to wit, kidnaping for the purpose of robbery; count II, the crime of kidnaping, a felony; counts III, IV, V, VI and VII, the crimes of rape, felonies; counts VIII, IX, X, XI and XII, violations of section 288a of the Penal Code; and count XIII, the crime of attempted robbery, a felony.

Appellants pleaded not- guilty to the charges set forth in the amended information. Thereafter jury trial was had and appellants were found “not guilty”…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Adkins v. BrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. People v. FerdinandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. People v. PantagesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. People v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Fost v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. People v. AbnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API