People v. Flores
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ROTH, J., pro tem.
Appellants were charged by an amended information, containing thirteen counts. Count I charged a violation of section 209 of the Penal Code, to wit, kidnaping for the purpose of robbery; count II, the crime of kidnaping, a felony; counts III, IV, V, VI and VII, the crimes of rape, felonies; counts VIII, IX, X, XI and XII, violations of section 288a of the Penal Code; and count XIII, the crime of attempted robbery, a felony.
Appellants pleaded not- guilty to the charges set forth in the amended information. Thereafter jury trial was had and appellants were found “not guilty”…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Adkins v. BrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- People v. FerdinandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. PantagesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- People v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Fost v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. AbnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.