Legal Opinion

People v. Hart

California Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1908No. Crim. No. 1426PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

The Justices of the district court of appeal for the third appellate district having given their respective opinions in this cause and being unable to agree in a judgment therein, the matter is brought to ■ this court for disposition.

The appellant, T. J. Hart, was jointly informed against with Evan Davis and James Flood for the crime of grand larceny. Davis, on his' arraignment, pleaded guilty to the charge. .What became of Flood the record does not disclose. The appellant was tried, convicted, and sentenced to four years’ imprisonment in San"Quentin, and from the judgment of conviction and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. ManasseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. People v. WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State v. SpencerIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  4. People v. BondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API