Legal Opinion

People v. Jones

California Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1911No. Crim. No. 1617PublishedCited by 79 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Plumas County and from an order refusing a new trial. J. 0. Honour, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

The defendant, informed against for the murder of George King, was convicted of murder in the second degree. Prom the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial he prosecutes this appeal.

Herein he urges certain rulings of the trial court in admitting and refusing to admit evidence and certain instructions given by the trial court as errors justifying his demand for a new trial. There was no question but that the homicide charged was committed by the defendant. His plea was self-defense. The evidence was in sharp conflict. The rulings of the court in admitting and rejecting…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. People v. DoyellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  3. People v. MizeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. People v. FlannellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. People v. BeltranCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. People v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API