Legal Opinion

Garfield v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas A. Aurelio, J.

The defendants-directors move for relief pursuant to rule 103, subdivision 4 of rule 106, and subdivisions 2 and 5 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice and section 476 of the Civil Practice Act. The issues involved are tendered and argued through voluminous affidavits and briefs, *215but, in the opinion of the court, are readily and simply disposable by close and accurate attention to what the amended complaint pleads and claims.

The amended complaint, as did the original complaint (7 Misc 2d 283; 7 Misc 2d 419; 4 A D 2d 861, 863) charges, with respect to the February, 1950, transactions,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Garfield v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Garfield v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Imberman v. AlexanderNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Garfield v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Garfield v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API