Imberman v. Alexander
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHenry Epstein, J.
A small group of policyholders in defendant Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States have brought several actions which have been consolidated in the instant complaint. This action, once dismissed for lack of prosecution, had been restored (12 Mise 2d 630 )and is now before this court for determination on the basis of pleadings, examinations before trial, exhibits introduced at said examinations and arguments, oral and via briefs. In the two causes of action plaintiffs have sought to have Equitable recover from defendant’s officers, directors el al., substantial sums allegedly…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pollitz v. . Wabash R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Blaustein v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- People v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- New York Credit Men's Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. WeissNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Blaustein v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Platt Corp. v. PlattNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Stern v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993