Legal Opinion

Garfield v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarold A. Stevens, J.

Defendant Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States and four individual defendants, directors of the company and served with the summons move for relief, pursuant to section 476 of the Civil Practice Act and subdivisions 2 and 4 of rules 106 and 107 of the Buies of Civil Practice, for dismissal of the complaint and of each of the three portions thereof based separately upon the three subject matters in concern. The relief sought is variously stated in 22 subdivisions of the notice of motion. Involved are a claimed illegal investment in the Gateway Center Project in Pittsburgh,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bullock v. . CooleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Ellsworth v. . LockwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  3. Garfield v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garfield v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Garfield v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Ducharme v. Compagnies D'Assurances Du Groupe DrouotAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API