Garfield v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtThomas A. Aurelio, J.
The defendant directors move for relief [see 7 Misc 2d 283, 419; 4 AD 2d 861, 863; 16 Misc 2d 214, *177216, 296] with respect to the third amended complaint pursuant to section 241 of the Civil Practice Act and rules 102 (subd. 1) and 103, and the grounds for such relief are set forth in the subdivisions of the notice of motion numbered (1) to (10) inclusive. With respect to subdivision (1), it cannot be said that there has been substantial disregard of the terms of the grant by the Appellate Division of leave to replead.
The appeal was taken from the order dismissing the second amended…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Abrams v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- People v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Ludlam v. Riverhead Bond & Mortgage Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Steinberg v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Garfield v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.