Legal Opinion

Garfield v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1956PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames B. M. McNally, J.

Motions 2260 and 2320 are consolidated and disposed of as follows.

In a derivative action, the defendants, Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, Murphy, Dow, Klein and *284Hogg, move to dismiss the complaint for legal insufficiency and plaintiff’s incapacity to sue. Plaintiff since 1928 has been and is a policyholder of Equitable. The individual defendants are charged as directors of Equitable. The complaint alleges the making of investments in real property by the defendants in violation of provisions of the Insurance Law. In addition, the complaint alleges improvident leasing of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Isaac v. MarcusNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Niagara Falls Power Co. v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Swan v. . Mutual Reserve Fund Life Assn.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Russell v. Pittsburgh Life & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Metropolitan Life Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Garfield v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Garfield v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Garfield v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API