Legal Opinion

Kilbarger Construction, Inc. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1988No. 87-968PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReilly, J.

This court is requested to determine if the subject property is used directly in the production of crude oil and natural gas or in the exploration for crude oil and natural gas.

Appellee audited appellant’s purchases from July 1, 1979 through March 31, 1982. Appellee charged a sálese and use tax upon two bulldozers which were used to clear a path to the drilling site and to clear and level the site. Appellee assessed another bulldozer which was used to build the access roads to the site and to build culverts. Four more assessed bulldozers were used to prepare the right-of-way for flow lines…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jennings & Churella Construction Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Frankelite Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Consolidation Coal Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. McWood Corp. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. VeriFone, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. K.S.T. Oil & Gas Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Stingray Pressure Pumping L.L.C. v. Tax Commr. of OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. K.S.T. Oil & Gas Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Lyons v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API