Legal Opinion

Timothy Thomas v. Edward Brennan, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Oxford, Wisconsin

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 10, 1992No. 91-1063PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Timothy Thomas is one of approximately 200 prisoners in federal custody serving “mixed sentences” for committing separate offenses under the United States Code and the District of Columbia Code. This case involves the interaction of federal and D.C. parole eligibility provisions as they apply to Thomas. The United States Parole Commission (“the Commission”) attempted to accommodate both sets of provisions in an interim rule, 28 C.F.R. § 2.66, applied in the present action to set Thomas’ parole hearing for the D.C. portion of his sentence in 1995. Thomas…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wilton Chatman-Bey v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  2. Ramesh Solomon v. Robert I. Elsea, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  3. Moss v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Scott A. FountainCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  5. Joseph E.L. Sullivan v. David R. Freeman and James C. DelworthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Wilson v. FullwoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. United States v. Joseph Martinez, Paul Mahn, and Garth CohenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Robert Ramirez v. Cecil A. Turner, Warden, United States Penitentiary-Marion, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Boone v. MenifeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API