Legal Opinion

United States v. Miami University Ohio State University, the Chronicle of Higher Education, Intervening

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 27, 2002No. 00-3518PublishedCited by 168 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KARL S. FORESTER, Chief District Judge.

Intervening Defendant-Appellant The Chronicle of Higher Education {“The Chronicle ”) contests the district court’s grant of summary judgment and subsequent permanent injunction in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee the United States. Specifically, the district court concluded that university disciplinary records were “educational records” as that term is de fined in the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (“FERPA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1232g, and that releasing such records and the personally identifiable information contained therein constitutes a violation…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by168 opinions

  1. William Howe v. City of AkronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  2. Charles W. Warren Ruth Warren v. City of Athens, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. Philecia Barnes v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. Detroit Free Press v. John AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. City of Cleveland v. OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API