Legal Opinion
Aetna Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. Licking Valley Milling Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 13, 1927No. 4750PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
This writ is to review a judgment for defendant in error (plaintiff below) upon an alleged policy of fire insurance on plaintiff’s mill, machinery, grain, etc., therein.
1. On the threshold we are met with the suggestion, in the brief of plaintiff in error on the merits, that the bill of exceptions be stricken from the record or disregarded because the assignment of errors was not filed “at or before the settling of the bill of exceptions,” as directed by the .first para- • graph of our rule 10, entitled “Bills of Exceptions.” We are disposed to treat the nonobservanee…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- St. Clair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Williams v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Eames v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Henry F. BellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. v. R. E. Parsons Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Continental Ins. Co. of City of New York v. FortnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- Lumbermen's Mut. Ins. v. Slide Rule & Scale Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Armborst v. Cincinnati Traction Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.